1. What is Non-Compartmental Analysis?
Non-Compartmental Analysis (NCA) is the most commonly used method for analyzing pharmacokinetic (PK) data from clinical and preclinical studies. Unlike compartmental modeling, NCA does not assume any specific structural model for how a drug distributes in the body. Instead, it uses mathematical techniques — primarily numerical integration — to calculate key PK parameters directly from observed concentration-time data.
NCA is often the first step in any PK analysis workflow. It provides essential summary parameters like AUC (area under the curve), Cmax (peak concentration), half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution. These parameters are routinely reported in:
- Phase I clinical trials — dose-ranging studies and first-in-human PK
- Bioequivalence (BE) studies — comparing generic vs. innovator formulations
- Preclinical PK studies — ADME characterization in animal models
- Regulatory submissions — FDA, EMA, and PMDA filings
The term "non-compartmental" means we don't assume the body is divided into compartments (like central + peripheral). We simply measure what goes in (dose) and what comes out (concentration over time), and calculate how the body handles the drug using statistical moments.
2. Concentration-Time Profiles
Every NCA analysis starts with a concentration-time profile — a series of measurements showing drug concentration in a biological matrix (typically plasma) at various time points after dosing.
For an oral (extravascular) dose, a typical profile looks like this:
- Absorption phase — concentration rises as the drug is absorbed from the GI tract
- Peak (Cmax) — the maximum concentration reached, occurring at time Tmax
- Elimination phase — concentration declines as the drug is metabolized and excreted
- Terminal phase — the final, approximately log-linear decline used for half-life estimation
For an intravenous (IV) bolus dose, there is no absorption phase — concentration starts at its highest and declines immediately.
3. Key NCA Parameters
Here are the primary parameters computed in a standard NCA analysis:
| Parameter | Definition | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Cmax | Maximum observed concentration | Relates to efficacy and toxicity thresholds |
| Tmax | Time to reach Cmax | Indicates absorption rate for oral drugs |
| AUC₀₋ₜ | Area under the curve from t=0 to last measured time | Total drug exposure over sampling period |
| AUC₀₋∞ | AUC extrapolated to infinity | Total drug exposure including terminal phase |
| t½ | Terminal elimination half-life | How long it takes for concentration to halve |
| λz | Terminal elimination rate constant | Rate of drug elimination in the terminal phase |
| CL/F | Apparent total body clearance | Body's ability to eliminate the drug |
| Vz/F | Apparent volume of distribution | Extent of drug distribution in tissues |
| MRT | Mean Residence Time | Average time a drug molecule stays in the body |
4. AUC Calculation: The Trapezoidal Rule
AUC is the most fundamental NCA parameter. It represents the total drug exposure — the integral of the concentration-time curve. Since we have discrete data points (not a continuous function), we approximate the integral using the trapezoidal rule.
Linear Trapezoidal Rule
For each pair of adjacent time points, the area of the trapezoid is:
Log-Linear Trapezoidal Rule
When concentration is declining (Cᵢ₊₁ < Cᵢ), the log-trapezoidal method provides a better approximation because drug elimination typically follows first-order (exponential) kinetics:
Linear-up Log-down Method
The Linear-up Log-down method is the most widely used approach in modern NCA software (including Phoenix WinNonlin, Kinetica, and PK-Swift). It combines both rules:
- Ascending segments (Cᵢ₊₁ ≥ Cᵢ): Use the linear trapezoidal formula
- Descending segments (Cᵢ₊₁ < Cᵢ): Use the log-linear trapezoidal formula
This approach is recommended by Gabrielsson & Weiner (2016) and is the standard method described in most pharmacokinetic textbooks.
5. Terminal Phase & Half-Life
The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) is estimated by fitting a linear regression to the natural logarithm of concentration versus time in the terminal phase:
The half-life is then derived directly from λz:
Selecting Terminal Phase Points
Choosing the correct terminal phase points is critical for accurate λz estimation. The "Best Fit" algorithm used by PK-Swift and commercial software:
- Considers all subsets of ≥ 3 consecutive points after Tmax
- Requires that all points have positive concentration
- Requires a negative slope (indicating elimination)
- Selects the subset with the highest adjusted R²
- Ties are broken by choosing the largest number of points
Including data points from the distribution phase (early decline) in the terminal regression will overestimate λz and underestimate half-life. Always verify that the selected terminal points form a clean log-linear decline.
6. Derived Parameters
Once AUC and λz are calculated, several important PK parameters can be derived:
Clearance (CL/F)
For extravascular dosing, apparent clearance is:
This tells us how efficiently the body removes the drug. Higher clearance = faster elimination.
Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)
A large Vz suggests the drug distributes extensively into tissues. A small Vz suggests it stays mainly in plasma.
Mean Residence Time (MRT)
MRT represents the average time a drug molecule spends in the body. AUMC (Area Under the First Moment Curve) is calculated similarly to AUC but using the t × C product.
7. Best Practices & Common Pitfalls
- Minimum 8–10 time points for reliable parameter estimation (at least 3 in the terminal phase)
- Include a pre-dose (t=0) measurement — especially important for IV dosing and baseline correction
- Check AUC extrapolation % — if AUC₀₋∞ has >20% extrapolated, the terminal phase may be poorly characterized
- Validate λz visually — always inspect the log-linear plot to ensure the selected regression points make pharmacological sense
- Handle BLQ data appropriately — pre-Cmax BLQ values are typically set to 0; post-Cmax BLQ may be set to 0 or handled with specific rules
- Report dose-normalized parameters when comparing across dose groups
Gabrielsson J, Weiner D. Pharmacokinetic & Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis. 5th ed. 2016 — the definitive textbook for NCA methodology.
Rowland M, Tozer TN. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. 4th ed. 2011 — excellent introduction to PK concepts.
8. Try It Yourself
🚀 Run Your Own NCA Analysis
PK-Swift's NCA Analyzer implements everything described in this guide — Linear-up Log-down integration, Best Fit λz selection, and all standard parameters. Just paste your data and get results instantly.
Open NCA AnalyzerNext: Theophylline Case Study — Step-by-Step NCA Walkthrough →